On the Side of Sweetness Carlo Dalla Vedova was simply impressive, trying first of all to clean up the trial from all useless arguments brought by the prosecutors, as we are hearing them these days and we have always heard before (“They brought even a cartoon!” he reminded); or urging the court “to stay on what is technical and essential, …
Read More »AMANDA KNOX AND HER LAWYERS DEMOLISH ALL ACCUSATIONS
Words that Taste of Truth Florence, December 17, 2013 Amanda solved the problem of her absence by sending a letter. She had always explained, since November 6, 2007, that she had nothing to do with the crime, but they wouldn’t believe her. Her texts were always twisted and translated in the right way, and read as a confirmation of her …
Read More »AMANDA KNOX & RAFFAELE SOLLECITO TRIAL: THE PROSECUTION CLOSES WITH NO PLAUSIBLE MOTIVE
Amanda’s Defense To Take the Stand Tomorrow in Florence Florence, December 16, 2013 Damn it, it looks like quite an investment, the one made by the Kercher family. They have a third seasoned attorney now, who today baldly exulted at the perfection of Knox and Sollecito’s previous convictions, and urged the jury to ice the cake by allowing a …
Read More »MEREDITH, AMANDA AND RAFFAELE: SAFETY NET FAIL
First World countries enjoy a measure of security that Third Worlds do not–laws, bylaws, statutes, and treaties protect us. We have a host of officials to enact those laws or raise awareness when someone is illegally tinkering with them. That Safety Net is available to every one of us as Due Process and it is our birthright. If those laws …
Read More »THE PROSECUTION TRIES: “GIVE 30 YEARS TO AMANDA KNOX”
Extremely Weak Arguments Brought Against Knox and SollecitoFrank Sfarzo in Florence, November 26, 2013 How can you accuse Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito when you have nothing tangible in your hands? With opinions, and the opinions brought by the prosecutor were, in my opinion, all wrong. Interesting, though, and appreciable, that he underlined every one of his opinions saying that …
Read More »CONVICTING AMANDA AND RAFFAELE WITH NO PROOF? FOR THE PROSECUTOR: YES YOU CAN!
Low Law Copy Number It’s a very simple case for prosecutor Horsehair. Can you convict someone with no proof? Sure! You just have to sum up all circumstantial evidence. But is there circumstantial evidence? Sure, plenty of it! Horsehair has indeed a time machine and brings us back to when people were still asking if Curatolo may be true, if …
Read More »